Jerusalem council and doctrinal conflict : an exegetical study of Acts 15:1-35

Abstract

Statement of the problem Authority is a significant factor for the existence and the function of the church. A pressing question is raised in regard to the conflict recorded in Acts 15:1-35: What authority did the Jerusalem Council have in regard to resolving doctrinal conflict? Purpose of the Study The purpose of this study is to explore the authority of a council in solving doctrinal conflicts as modeled by Acts 15:1-35. By examining the source, nature and practice of the authority of the Jerusalem Council, one can better understand and apply the concepts governing the authority of the church authority is to be used the contemporary scene. Significance of the Study By examining this issue in depth, certain important Biblical principles can be uncovered which will assist the church in dealing with doctrinal conflicts. Thus, the church will be much better able to fulfill the agent of gospel ministry. Methodology The methodology employed in this study is exegetical and theological. The method adopted is the historical-biblical method implemented by applying the principles of sola scriptura, with the unity of the Bible text as the basic assumption. Findings The study of the confrontation in Acts reveals that an authoritative decision could only be reached through an authoritative body. The church leadership in the hands of the "pillars" did not have enough authority to solve the doctrinal conflict as recorded in Acts 15:1-35. An authoritative assembly was needed to meet that purpose. The Jerusalem council was the highest church authority on earth. The assembly exercised the principles of democracy under a combined influence of Hellenism and Judaism. At the same time, the readers practiced servant leadership. Through a manifestation of representative democracy, the assembly made a decision by consensus endorsed by the Holy Spirit.