An Appreciative inquiry of the integration of faith and learning practices in Adventist higher educational institutions in Southeast Asia

DSpace Repository

Library

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Trye, Adventor Mulbah, Jr.
dc.date.accessioned 2017-06-20T01:26:59Z
dc.date.available 2017-06-20T01:26:59Z
dc.date.issued 2017-03
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.aiias.edu/handle/3442/649
dc.description Unpublished Dissertation (PhD Education) en_US
dc.description.abstract Beginning from the time people browse a website or enter the admissions office of a Christian institution until their time of exit, they are to be conversant with the integration of faith and learning (IFL) practices (Nwosu, 1999; Rasi, 1999). I chose a descriptive qualitative case study design using an appreciative inquiry approach for this study. I used interviews, observations, curriculum documents, and the literature review to collect the data from 104 participants. The participants included six integration of faith and learning experts from around the world, 35 online participants in the pilot study, 21 integration of faith and learning practitioners, and 42 students from three Adventist Higher Educational Institutions in Southeast Asia. Using the appreciative inquiry process was a positive experience for me and for the participants. The results described what the IFL strengths were of the different institutions and what needed to improve while maintaining a positive atmosphere. In order to make integration of faith and learning more practical I developed an Innovation Configuration for IFL. Creating the innovation configuration map for IFL practices in Adventist Higher Educational Institutions in Southeast Asia was a collaborative and iterative process with the experts and practitioners. The innovation configuration map includes 10 components necessary for implementing IFL from an Adventist worldview. The innovation configuration is a description of the practitioners’ action and the focus is on what people actually do (Gaikwad, 1991; Henriquez-Roark, 1995; Hord, Stiegelbauer, Hall, & George, 2013). The reason IFL is important is because it is the interpretation of Adventist educators that goes beyond what public schools practice. Other religious organizations practice IFL, however, Seventh-day Adventists have a distinct set of beliefs and values that are important to identify and teach. It is how Adventist educators add value to what they do in schools. It gives our institutions a reason for existence. It is an area that continues to need additional research. Seventh-day Adventist educators have not had an operational definition of IFL before that serves as a self-evaluation tool for teachers, and an observational tool for peers. It will be helpful to supervisors because they will have something specific to use to suggest professional development activities and students, teachers, and staff will have more specific vocabulary to enable them to think, discuss, demonstrate, and implement IFL. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Adventist International Institute of Advanced Studies en_US
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ *
dc.subject Christian education en_US
dc.subject Learning and scholarship en_US
dc.subject Universities and colleges -- Administration. en_US
dc.subject Seventh-day Adventists -- Christian education. en_US
dc.title An Appreciative inquiry of the integration of faith and learning practices in Adventist higher educational institutions in Southeast Asia en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account